Asynchronous Multimodal Sensor Data Fusion for Label-Scarce Health Indicator Mining in Composite Structure Monitoring

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63646/FEPP4520

Keywords:

Asynchronous sensor fusion; health indicator mining; semi-supervised learning; acoustic emission; guided waves; composite structures; structural health monitoring

Abstract

Structural health monitoring (SHM) of composite aerospace panels requires comprehensive health indicators (HIs) that capture multiscale damage evolution under complex fatigue loading. However, constructing reliable HIs is hampered by the asynchronous acquisition rates of passive and active sensing modalities, the scarcity of ground-truth labels, and the heterogeneous information content of complementary sensor streams. This study proposes a multi-level asynchronous multimodal sensor data fusion framework that integrates passive acoustic emission (AE) and active guided wave (GW) sensing to mine high-quality HIs for T-stiffener composite panels without labeled failure data. Three intra-modality AE pipelines and one GW pipeline are developed under an inductive semi-supervised learning paradigm, using physics-informed proxy labels and criteria-driven regularization to enforce monotonicity, prognosability, and trendability. A causal zero-order-hold synchronization scheme aligns the dense AE timeline with sparse GW acquisitions. Late-fusion regression models—including Gaussian process regression, gradient boosting, support vector machines, multilayer perceptrons, and long short-term memory networks—are benchmarked for inter-modality HI fusion. Leave-one-out cross-validation on 12 AE units and 5 GW units demonstrates that the fused HIs consistently exceed a Fitness score of 90%, with the LSTM-based fusion achieving up to 97% ± 2% cohort-level performance. The proposed framework offers a scalable and deployable blueprint for next-generation prognostics in safety-critical composite structures.

How to Cite

Zhou, Y., Zhang, C., & Xiao, X. (2026). Asynchronous Multimodal Sensor Data Fusion for Label-Scarce Health Indicator Mining in Composite Structure Monitoring. Data Science & Big Data Technology, 4(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.63646/FEPP4520

References

Alleyne, D., & Cawley, P. (1992). A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(3), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400530

Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798–1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50

Boller, C., Chang, F. K., & Fujino, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061626

Chapelle, O., Scholkopf, B., & Zien, A. (Eds.). (2009). Semi-supervised learning. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001

Christensen, R. M. (2013). The theory of materials failure. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662111.001.0001

Coble, J. B., & Hines, J. W. (2011). Identifying optimal prognostic parameters from data: A genetic algorithms approach. Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2011.v2i1.2009

Dasarathy, B. V. (1994). Decision fusion. IEEE Computer Society Press.

Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1

Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2007). An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365(1851), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928

Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2012). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118443118

Frazier, P. I. (2018). A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02811. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.02811

Fromme, P., Wilcox, P. D., Lowe, M. J. S., & Cawley, P. (2006). On the development and testing of a guided ultrasonic wave array for structural integrity monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 53(4), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1621502

Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, 48, 1050–1059.

Giurgiutiu, V. (2008). Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088760-6.50007-8

Goebel, K., Daigle, M., Saxena, A., Roychoudhury, I., Sankararaman, S., & Celaya, J. (2008). Prognostics: The science of making predictions. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.

Graves, A. (2012). Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2

Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4

Grosse, C. U., & Ohtsu, M. (Eds.). (2008). Acoustic emission testing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69972-9

Haghani, R., Al-Emrani, M., & Heshmati, M. (2012). Fatigue-prone details in steel bridges. Buildings, 2(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2040456

Hall, D. L., & Llinas, J. (1997). An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.554205

Hamstad, M. A. (1994). Thirty years of advances and some remaining challenges in the application of acoustic emission to composite materials. In P. J. Shull (Ed.), Acoustic emission: Current practice and future directions. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP13003S

Heimes, F. O. (2008). Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation. International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711422

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Hullermeier, E., & Waegeman, W. (2021). Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods. Machine Learning, 110(3), 457–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3

Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kim, S., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2012). Decision fusion in structural health monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2744–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.161

Lamb, H. (1917). On waves in an elastic plate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 93(648), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1917.0008

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lee, J., Wu, F., Zhao, W., Ghaffari, M., Liao, L., & Siegel, D. (2014). Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 42(1–2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.003

Li, Y., Kurfess, T. R., & Liang, S. Y. (2012). Stochastic prognostics for rolling element bearings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 14(5), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2000.1301

Lissenden, C. J. (2021). Nonlinear ultrasonic guided waves—principles for nondestructive evaluation. Journal of Applied Physics, 129(2), 021101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038340

Listou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Unsupervised fault detection in F0: Data from a subsea gas compressor. Data in Brief, 23, 103804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103804

Liu, C., Gryllias, K., & Kanfoud, J. (2020). A new deep learning network for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041372

Liu, H., Liu, C., & Huang, Y. (2019a). Adaptive feature extraction using sparse coding for machinery fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 107, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.040

Liu, J., Wang, W., Ma, F., Yang, Y. B., & Yang, C. (2019b). A data-model-fusion prognostic framework for dynamic system state forecasting. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(7), 1680–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2013.05.001

Migot, A., Bhuiyan, M. Y., & Giurgiutiu, V. (2022). Multi-sensor guided wave fusion for structural health monitoring of composites. Sensors, 22(10), 3836. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103836

Mosallam, A., Medjaher, K., & Zerhouni, N. (2016). Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(5), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0933-4

Mujica, L. E., Vehi, J., Ruiz, M., Verleysen, M., Staszewski, W., & Worden, K. (2010). Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.07.004

Nascimento, R. G., & Viana, F. A. C. (2019). Fleet prognosis with physics-informed recurrent neural networks. Structural Health Monitoring, 20(2), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720954819

Nitta, K., Nakayama, T., & Yamashita, M. (2022). Semi-supervised learning for health condition evaluation from industrial IoT data. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101570

Nuhaa, N., Hasan, M. K., Islam, S., & Marzouk, T. (2022). A comprehensive review on health indicator construction methods for data-driven machinery prognostics. IEEE Access, 10, 87756–87795. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3200022

Ostachowicz, W., Kudela, P., Krawczuk, M., & Zak, A. (2012). Guided waves in structures for SHM: The time-domain spectral element method. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119965855

Pecht, M. G. (2008). Prognostics and health management of electronics. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470385845

Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 6(3), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199

Qing, X., Kumar, A., Zhang, C., Gonzalez, I. F., Guo, G., & Chang, F. K. (2007). A hybrid piezoelectric/fiber optic diagnostic system for structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures, 14(3), S98–S103. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/3/012

Quaresimin, M., Susmel, L., & Talreja, R. (2010). Fatigue behaviour and life assessment of composite laminates under multiaxial loadings. International Journal of Fatigue, 32(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.012

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001

Rizzo, P., Scalea, F. L. di., & Uckan, M. (2007). Wavelet-based unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection in structural health monitoring. Smart Structures and Systems, 3(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2007.3.3.297

Rose, J. L. (2014). Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107273610

Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2008). Turbofan engine degradation simulation data set. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames Research Center.

Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414

Seera, M., & Lim, C. P. (2014). A hybrid intelligent system for medical data classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(5), 2237–2251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.022

Si, X. S., Wang, W., Hu, C. H., & Zhou, D. H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation—A review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018

Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., & Adams, R. P. (2012). Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 2951–2959.

Soutis, C. (2005). Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004

Staszewski, W. J. (2002). Intelligent signal processing for damage detection in composite materials. Composites Science and Technology, 62(7–8), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00008-8

Staszewski, W., Boller, C., & Tomlinson, G. (Eds.). (2004). Health monitoring of aerospace structures: Smart sensor technologies and signal processing. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470092866

Su, Z., Ye, L., & Lu, Y. (2006). Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 295(3–5), 753–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020

Talreja, R., & Singh, C. V. (2012). Damage and failure of composite materials. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016551

Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2018). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186

Torres, M. E., Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., & Flandrin, P. (2011). A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 4144–4147. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265

Vachtsevanos, G., Lewis, F. L., Roemer, M., Hess, A., & Wu, B. (2006). Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470117842

Van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020). A survey on semi-supervised learning. Machine Learning, 109(2), 373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6

Virkler, D. A., Hillberry, B. M., & Goel, P. K. (1979). The statistical nature of fatigue crack propagation. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 101(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3443666

Worden, K., & Farrar, C. R. (2007). The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 463(2082), 1639–1664. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1834

Wu, Z., & Huang, N. E. (2009). Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047

Yan, J., Koc, M., & Lee, J. (2004). A prognostic algorithm for machine performance assessment and its application. Production Planning & Control, 15(8), 796–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280412331283241

Zhang, B., Sconyers, C., Byington, C., Patrick, R., Orchard, M. E., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2011). A probabilistic fault detection approach: Application to bearing fault detection. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(5), 2011–2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2058072

Zhang, Q., Hua, C., & Xu, G. (2019). A mixture Weibull proportional hazard model for mechanical system failure prediction utilising lifetime and monitoring data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 43(1–2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.10.013

Zhang, W., Li, C., Peng, G., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100, 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022

Zhang, X., Wan, S., He, Y., Wang, X., & Dou, L. (2021a). Teager energy spectral kurtosis of wavelet packet transform and its application in locating the sound source of fault bearing of belt conveyor. Measurement, 173, 108565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108565

Zhang, Z., Song, Y., & Li, S. (2020). Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 107093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107093

Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050

Zhao, R., Yan, R., Wang, J., & Mao, K. (2017). Learning to monitor machine health with convolutional bi-directional LSTM networks. Sensors, 17(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020273

Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., Yu, X., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2020). Applications of unsupervised deep transfer learning to intelligent fault diagnosis: A survey and comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 3525921. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3053515

Zhu, J., Nostrand, T., Spiegel, C., & Morton, B. (2014). Survey of condition indicators for condition monitoring systems. Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2014.v5i1.2464

Zhu, X. J. (2005). Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical Report 1530, Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Zhu, Y., Liu, C., & Jiang, W. (2018). Joint operational and financial risk management of power utilities using Markov decision processes. Applied Energy, 226, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.019